Install
Inside DeepSeek Harness, with dsh-market
dsh plugin --profile web add dshmarket
Or from the command line
dsh plugin --profile web add github:LeslieWylie/review-workflow
Installing runs third-party code with your own permissions — it can read your files, use your credentials and reach the network. Review the source first, and pin a commit (github:owner/repo#sha) when you can.
README
What is this
A generic multi-panelist review workflow skill. Generalized from an internal collaboration-review process, suitable for any structured review scenario — project review, paper review, code review, design review, etc.
Core Capabilities
| Module | Content |
|---|---|
| 6-Step Process + 6 Checkpoints | Material completeness check → Bundle preparation → N-panelist parallel scoring → Aggregation → Critic review → Final decision |
| N Independent Panelists | Panelists run in isolated subagents, blind to each other, preventing bias contamination |
| Anchor Consistency Check | Two-phase disagreement resolution: anchor matching → Δ-level adjudication |
| Independent Critic Review | Isolated subagent reviews process compliance, challenges reasoning gaps |
| Re-review Support | Incremental re-review: only re-evaluate changed dimensions |
| Configurable | Review dimensions, scoring criteria, templates, panelist count all configurable |
Install
dsh plugin --profile web add "github:LeslieWylie/review-workflow"
After restart, load the skill in any session:
load review-workflow
Required Configuration
This skill requires project-level configuration (in the project's own skill or config files):
| Config | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| rubric | Review dimensions and scoring criteria | 5 dimensions, 5-point scale with anchor descriptions |
| bundle template | Review material bundle template | bundle.md |
| panelist prompt | Panelist prompt template | panelist-prompt.md |
| aggregation template | Aggregation report template | aggregation.md |
| critic template | Critic report template | critic-report.md |
| checklist | Material completeness checklist | proposal-checklist.md |
| panelist count | Number of panelists | 2 |
| score threshold | Pass/fail threshold per dimension | ≥3/5 |
Design Principles
- Scenario-agnostic: Only defines the review process skeleton. Specific dimensions, criteria, and templates come from the project
- Role isolation: Panelists run independently, Critic in isolated session, preventing bias
- Checkpoint enforcement: Each step has a checkpoint; cannot proceed without passing
- Auditable: All intermediate artifacts saved to disk, fully traceable
Sanitization Notice
This plugin was generalized from an internal collaboration-review process. All internal project references (specific project names, model names, internal tool paths, etc.) have been removed.
Changelog
See CHANGELOG.md.
License
MIT